Roger Stanev

8 papers receiving 72 citations

Peers

Roger Stanev
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Family Practice 2
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 5
  • General Health Professions 14
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 14
  • Statistics and Probability 4
Replace Gwen Brierley with:
Gwen Brierley United Kingdom
Joanna Bowen United Kingdom
Khalil Kalavani Iran
Lewis McConnachie United Kingdom
Chidubem B. Ogwulu United Kingdom
Camila Ávila Chile
Liya Lomsadze United States
Anne Bulchis United States
Leonid Daya Cameroon
Ailish Houlihan Ireland
Roger Stanev relative to Gwen Brierley United Kingdom Gwen Brierley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Gwen Brierley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Stanev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Stanev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Stanev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Stanev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Stanev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Stanev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Stanev. The network helps show where Roger Stanev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Roger Stanev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Stanev Line = papers co-authored together Roger Stanev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201757
2 20115
3 20173
4 20123
5 20082
6 20151
7 20121
8 20141
9 20160
10 20120

About Roger Stanev

Roger Stanev is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 73 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (2 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (5 citations), General Health Professions (14 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (14 citations) and Statistics and Probability (4 citations). Roger Stanev has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Eddy Lang, Elizabeth Matovinovic, Jasvinder A. Singh, Beverly Shea, Elie A. Akl, Lorenzo Moja, Rachael L. Morton, Matthias Briel, Kevin Pottie and Peter Tugwell. Their work appears in journals such as Metamedicine, Medical Decision Making, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Philosophy of Science and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact