Roderic Gill

409 citations
7 papers · 281 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Roderic Gill

6 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Roderic Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 76
  • Management Science and Operations Research 58
  • Global and Planetary Change 73
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24
  • Marketing 20
Replace Joanneke Kruijsen with:
Joanneke Kruijsen United Kingdom
Tony Meppem Australia
Axel Volkery Germany
Paul-Marie Boulanger Belgium
Alicia G. Harley United States
Mónica Castro Spain
Fred Luks Germany
Johannes Schiller Germany
Andreas Kläy Switzerland
André Taylor Australia
Roderic Gill relative to Joanneke Kruijsen United Kingdom Joanneke Kruijsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Joanneke Kruijsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roderic Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roderic Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roderic Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roderic Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roderic Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roderic Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roderic Gill. The network helps show where Roderic Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Roderic Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roderic Gill Line = papers co-authored together Roderic Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1998145
2 2005104
3 199616
4 20078
5 20167
6
Catalysing design principles through the dreaming of sustainable subtropical cityscapes: the collaborative construction of new place identities
20061
7
Design for Social Systems: Change as Conversation
20080

About Roderic Gill

Roderic Gill is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (1 paper), Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis (1 paper), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Sustainable Industrial Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (76 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (58 citations), Global and Planetary Change (73 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (24 citations) and Marketing (20 citations). Roderic Gill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Meppem, Tian Shi, Robert W. Simpson, Simon Ferrier, Murray Ellis, Michael Drielsma, Lalit Kumar and Michael O’Loughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Development in Practice, Land Use Policy, System Dynamics Review and QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact