Ecological Economics

7.2k papers and 403.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.2k papers published in Ecological Economics in the last decades have received a total of 403.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Ecological Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (3.8k papers), Global and Planetary Change (2.2k papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Economic and Environmental Valuation (2.2k papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (1.1k papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (940 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecological Economics are Soumyananda Dinda, Klaus Rennings, Robert Costanza, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Sven Wunder, R.S. de Groot, Matthew Wilson, Thomas Wiedmann, David Pimentel and Herman E. Daly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecological Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecological Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecological Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Ecological Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecological Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecological Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecological Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025