Development in Practice

2.3k papers and 25.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Development in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 25.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Development in Practice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (832 papers), Economics and Econometrics (315 papers) and Development (313 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (305 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (276 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (218 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Development in Practice are John Overton, Sarah C. White, Jonathan Fox, James Copestake, Deborah Eade, Andréa Cornwall, Jo Rowlands, David Mosse, David A. Lewis and Alison Mathie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Development in Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Development in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development in Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Development in Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development in Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025