Countries where authors publish in Development in Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development in Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Development in Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Development in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development in Practice.
About Development in Practice
The 2.3k papers published in Development in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 31.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Development in Practice usually cover Development (307 papers), Business and International Management (148 papers), Safety Research (314 papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (230 papers) and Urban Studies (126 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (299 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (295 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (223 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (220 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (161 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (160 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (148 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Development in Practice are Sarah C. White, John Overton, Jonathan Fox, Deborah Eade, Andréa Cornwall, James Copestake, Jo Rowlands, Srilatha Batliwala, Alison Mathie and Gord Cunningham.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.