Countries where authors publish in Development in Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development in Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Development in Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Development in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development in Practice.
About Development in Practice
The 2.4k papers published in Development in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 34.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Development in Practice usually cover Development (321 papers), Business and International Management (148 papers), Safety Research (309 papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (230 papers) and Urban Studies (126 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (312 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (290 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (227 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (224 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (159 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (159 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (148 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Development in Practice are Sarah C. White, John Overton, Jonathan Fox, James Copestake, Deborah Eade, Andréa Cornwall, Jo Rowlands, Srilatha Batliwala, Alison Mathie and Gord Cunningham.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.