Robert Weis

1.4k citations
37 papers · 922 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Weis

35 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Robert Weis
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Clinical Psychology 448
  • Applied Psychology 101
  • Safety Research 175
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 107
Replace Nan Zhang Hampton with:
Nan Zhang Hampton United States
Angela F. Y. Siu Hong Kong
Alison Bryant United States
Jamin Day Australia
Laurel J. Kiser United States
Daniel R. Hale United Kingdom
Miwa Yasui United States
Kathleen Chwalisz United States
Lela Rankin Williams United States
Maria Lúcia Seidl de Moura Brazil
Robert Weis relative to Nan Zhang Hampton United States Nan Zhang Hampton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Nan Zhang Hampton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Weis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Weis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Weis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Weis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Weis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Weis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Weis. The network helps show where Robert Weis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Robert Weis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Weis Line = papers co-authored together Robert Weis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999160
2 2011103
3 201081
4 202058
5 201452
6 200537
7 200836
8 201534
9 200828
10 200227
11 201725
12 201625
13 200423
14 201123
15 201919
16 200219
17 200219
18 200516
19 202115
20 201315

About Robert Weis

Robert Weis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Disability Education and Employment (9 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (448 citations), Applied Psychology (101 citations), Safety Research (175 citations), Social Psychology (188 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (107 citations). Robert Weis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Christine Lovejoy, Elizabeth A. O’Hare, Erin E. Toolis, Brad Lundahl and Nicole L. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Psychological Injury and Law, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Psychological Services and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact