Robert Schiff

9 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Robert Schiff
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Atmospheric Science 156
  • General Psychology 6
  • Spectroscopy 66
  • Catalysis 26
  • Business and International Management 5
Replace R. H. Smith with:
R. H. Smith United States
Liang-Chun Lin Taiwan
Gérard Laverdet France
Patricia Cleary United States
I. T. N. Jones United States
F. Nolting Germany
Ditte Thomsen Denmark
David W. Stewart United Kingdom
C. B. M. Groß Germany
Benjamin N. Frandsen Denmark
Robert Schiff relative to R. H. Smith United States R. H. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. H. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Schiff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Schiff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Schiff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Schiff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Schiff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Schiff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Schiff. The network helps show where Robert Schiff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert Schiff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Schiff Line = papers co-authored together Robert Schiff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 197473
2 197854
3 197554
4 197247
5
Two trillion and counting : assessing the credit gap for micro, small, and medium-size enterprises in the developing world
201029
6 197412
7 20135
8 20142
9
Recent Kinetic Measurements on the Reactions of O( 3 P) H and HO 2
19731

About Robert Schiff

Robert Schiff is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Spectroscopy, Catalysis, Materials Chemistry and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 9 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (3 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (2 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper) and Global Health and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (156 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Spectroscopy (66 citations), Catalysis (26 citations) and Business and International Management (5 citations). Robert Schiff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Douglas D. Davis, S. Fischer, Robert T. Watson, Nelson Smith, James O. Prochaska, Peer Stein, S. Wagner, Gerald J. Smith, A. R. Ravishankara and D. D. DAVIS. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica and Journal of Media Literacy Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact