Robert Sanderman

11 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Robert Sanderman
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Applied Psychology 48
  • Oncology 160
  • Clinical Psychology 120
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 148
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 96
Replace Cheryl L. Shigaki with:
Cheryl L. Shigaki United States
Laura K. Hart United States
Azadeh Tavoli Iran
Sharon J. Olsen United States
Lynn Dunwoody United Kingdom
F. C. E. van Knippenberg Netherlands
Sheila Kelly United Kingdom
Beth Leedham United States
Robert Tunmore United Kingdom
Karen Galway United Kingdom
Robert Sanderman relative to Cheryl L. Shigaki United States Cheryl L. Shigaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cheryl L. Shigaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Sanderman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Sanderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Sanderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Sanderman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Sanderman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Sanderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Sanderman. The network helps show where Robert Sanderman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Sanderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Sanderman Line = papers co-authored together Robert Sanderman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2001183
2 1996149
3 201668
4 200566
5 201438
6 199532
7 200131
8 199016
9 19877
10 20012
11
A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: A diary study on naturally occurring social comparison processes among patients with Hodgkin an Non-Hodgkin's disease
19961

About Robert Sanderman

Robert Sanderman is a scholar working on Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (48 citations), Oncology (160 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (148 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (96 citations). Robert Sanderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joost Heyink, Reike Tempelaar, Chris Nijboer, Mattanja Triemstra, Geertrudis A.M. van den Bos, Jane Wardle, Andrew Steptoe, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Daniël W. Hommes and Monique H. W. Frings‐Dresen. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Psychology and Health, Personality and Individual Differences, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact