Robert Sanderman
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Nursing care and research
-
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Joost Heyink (1 shared paper)G.A.M. van den Bos (3 shared papers)Reike Tempelaar (3 shared papers)Chris Nijboer (3 shared papers)Mattanja Triemstra (3 shared papers)Jane Wardle (1 shared paper)Andrew Steptoe (1 shared paper)Klaas Postema A (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychology and Health (2 papers)Personality and Individual Differences (2 papers)Cancer (2 papers)European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (1 paper)Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Sanderman
12 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pharmacy 158
- Oncology 167
- Applied Psychology 21
- Clinical Psychology 58
- Pharmacology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Sanderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Sanderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Sanderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Sanderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Sanderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Sanderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Sanderman. The network helps show where Robert Sanderman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Sanderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 195 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 147 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 12 | A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: A diary study on naturally occurring social comparison processes among patients with Hodgkin an Non-Hodgkin's disease | 1996 | 1 |
About Robert Sanderman
Robert Sanderman is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Oncology, Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Nursing care and research (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper) and Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (158 citations), Oncology (167 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations), Clinical Psychology (58 citations) and Pharmacology (34 citations). Robert Sanderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joost Heyink, G.A.M. van den Bos, Reike Tempelaar, Chris Nijboer, Mattanja Triemstra, Jane Wardle, Andrew Steptoe, Klaas Postema A, Cees P. van der Schans and Hans Arendzen. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Personality and Individual Differences, Cancer, European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Psycho-Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.