Robert Sanderman
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
-
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Joost Heyink (1 shared paper)Reike Tempelaar (3 shared papers)Geertrudis A.M. van den Bos (3 shared papers)Chris Nijboer (3 shared papers)Mattanja Triemstra (3 shared papers)Andrew Steptoe (1 shared paper)Jane Wardle (1 shared paper)Mirjam A. G. Sprangers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychology and Health (2 papers)Personality and Individual Differences (2 papers)Cancer (2 papers)Quality of Life Research (1 paper)European Journal of Pain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Sanderman
12 papers receiving 612 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Applied Psychology 34
- Oncology 134
- Clinical Psychology 93
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
- Health 26
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Sanderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Sanderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Sanderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Sanderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Sanderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Sanderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Sanderman. The network helps show where Robert Sanderman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Sanderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 197 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: A diary study on naturally occurring social comparison processes among patients with Hodgkin an Non-Hodgkin's disease | 1996 | 1 |
About Robert Sanderman
Robert Sanderman is a scholar working on Oncology, Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (34 citations), Oncology (134 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (60 citations) and Health (26 citations). Robert Sanderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joost Heyink, Reike Tempelaar, Geertrudis A.M. van den Bos, Chris Nijboer, Mattanja Triemstra, Andrew Steptoe, Jane Wardle, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, R. Otter and Daniël W. Hommes. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Personality and Individual Differences, Cancer, Quality of Life Research and European Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.