Robert Tunmore

1.2k citations
14 papers · 978 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Tunmore

12 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

Robert Tunmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Oncology 499
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
  • Research and Theory 18
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • General Health Professions 75
Replace Barbara Stein with:
Barbara Stein Germany
Kathleen Beck‐Coon United States
Versie Johnson‐Mallard United States
Sue Burney Australia
Chelsea G. Ratcliff United States
Barbara Muzzatti Italy
Constantina Papadopoulou United Kingdom
Jayne Chidgey United Kingdom
Jan Koopmans Netherlands
Christine Maheu Canada
Robert Tunmore relative to Barbara Stein Germany Barbara Stein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Barbara Stein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Tunmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Tunmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Tunmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Tunmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Tunmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Tunmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Tunmore. The network helps show where Robert Tunmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Robert Tunmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Tunmore Line = papers co-authored together Robert Tunmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1991560
2 1991241
3 199498
4 200623
5 199217
6
Mental health. Encouraging collaboration.
199410
7
Liaison psychiatric nursing in oncology.
19898
8 19976
9
The consultation liaison nurse.
19905
10 20005
11
Liaison psychiatry. Setting the pace.
19903
12 19992
13 19890
14 20120

About Robert Tunmore

Robert Tunmore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory, Oncology, General Health Professions and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 14 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Palliative and Oncologic Care (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (499 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations), Research and Theory (18 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). Robert Tunmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. Robertson, Judith M. Bliss, Steven Greer, Maggie Watson, Christine Gorman, Stirling Moorey, Ben Thomas, Matthew G. Law, Alison Tingle and Trevor Murrells. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Cancer Nursing, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact