Robert Philip
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Diverse Musicological Studies
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Music History and Culture
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
Papers in
- Music 9
- Diverse Musicological Studies 8
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 8
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 3
- Music History and Culture 3
- Co-authors
- Clive Brown (1 shared paper)Walter Frisch (1 shared paper)Jonathan Bellman (1 shared paper)Michael Musgrave (1 shared paper)Martin Clayton (2 shared papers)Bernard D. Sherman (1 shared paper)Walter Blume (1 shared paper)David Rowland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Early Music (1 paper)Ethnomusicology (1 paper)Notes (1 paper)Asian Music (1 paper)Yale University Press eBooks (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Philip
8 papers receiving 49 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Music 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 29
- Signal Processing 13
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 20
- Rehabilitation 2
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Philip
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Philip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Philip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Philip. The network helps show where Robert Philip may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert Philip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 43 | |
| 2 | Performing Brahms : early evidence of performance style | 2003 | 12 |
| 3 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 8 | Agassi: The Fall and Rise of the Enfant Terrible of Tennis | 1994 | 1 |
| 9 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 12 | The Life, Times, and Characteristics of John Bunyan, Author of the Pilgrim's Progress | 2003 | 0 |
| 13 | 1996 | 0 |
About Robert Philip
Robert Philip is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics and History, having authored 13 papers that have together received 71 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Musicological Studies (8 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (8 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (3 papers), Music History and Culture (3 papers), Cultural and Artistic Studies (1 paper), Sports Analytics and Performance (1 paper), Travel Writing and Literature (1 paper) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (59 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (29 citations), Signal Processing (13 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (20 citations) and Rehabilitation (2 citations). Robert Philip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Clive Brown, Walter Frisch, Jonathan Bellman, Michael Musgrave, Martin Clayton, Bernard D. Sherman, Walter Blume, David Rowland, John Griffiths and Colin Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as Early Music, Ethnomusicology, Notes, Asian Music and Yale University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.