Frederick Neumann

497 citations
39 papers · 146 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Music top 1%
    • Musicology and Musical Analysis
    • Theater, Performance, and Music History
    • Diverse Musicological Studies
    • Music History and Culture
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Frederick Neumann

22 papers receiving 51 citations

Peers

Frederick Neumann
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Music 108
  • Classics 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 29
  • Museology 4
  • Rehabilitation 6
Replace Robert Philip with:
Robert Philip United Kingdom
Michael Musgrave United States
Bernard D. Sherman United States
James Webster
Elaine R. Sisman United States
Willi Apel United States
Ross W. Duffin United States
Karl Kroeger
Floyd K. Grave Netherlands
Jan LaRue United States
Frederick Neumann relative to Robert Philip United Kingdom Robert Philip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Philip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Neumann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Neumann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Neumann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Neumann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Neumann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Neumann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Neumann. The network helps show where Frederick Neumann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Neumann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Neumann Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Neumann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197833
2 196528
3 197722
4
Essays in performance practice
19828
5 19967
6
Contemporary violin technique
19667
7 19885
8 19714
9 19614
10 19883
11 19822
12 19882
13 19652
14 19912
15 19912
16 19702
17 19661
18 19811
19 19851
20 19661

About Frederick Neumann

Frederick Neumann is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Literature and Literary Theory, Rehabilitation and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (23 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (7 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (6 papers), Musicians’ Health and Performance (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (108 citations), Classics (19 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (29 citations), Museology (4 citations) and Rehabilitation (6 citations). Frederick Neumann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Fuller, Joel H. Shapiro and Robert Bloch. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, Journal of the American Musicological Society, Music and Letters, Journal of Musicology and Early Music.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact