Robert Nash
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media 18
- Surgery 14
- Head and Neck Anomalies 4
- Co-authors
- Arvind Singh (10 shared papers)Ravi Kumar Lingam (5 shared papers)A. Kalan (2 shared papers)Jeremy Lavy (6 shared papers)Felice D’Arco (10 shared papers)A Arora (1 shared paper)S. Khemani (1 shared paper)Nikul Amin (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Otology & Neurotology (7 papers)International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (7 papers)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (7 papers)Cochlear Implants International (5 papers)Neuroradiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Robert Nash
71 papers receiving 671 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Otorhinolaryngology 149
- Sensory Systems 59
- Surgery 211
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
- Neurology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Nash. The network helps show where Robert Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 11 |
About Robert Nash
Robert Nash is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Genetics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 711 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (18 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (5 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (4 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Noise Effects and Management (2 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (149 citations), Sensory Systems (59 citations), Surgery (211 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (93 citations) and Neurology (32 citations). Robert Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Arvind Singh, Ravi Kumar Lingam, A. Kalan, Jeremy Lavy, Felice D’Arco, A Arora, S. Khemani, Nikul Amin, K G Callum and B.D. Braithwaite. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Cochlear Implants International and Neuroradiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.