Cochlear Implants International

1.3k papers and 11.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Cochlear Implants International in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Cochlear Implants International usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k papers), Sensory Systems (462 papers) and Speech and Hearing (304 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1.0k papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (457 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (301 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cochlear Implants International are Levent Sennaroğlu, Donna L. Sorkin, W. P. R. Gibson, Karyn L. Galvin, Sue Archbold, Thomas Lenarz, Chris Raine, Kate Gfeller, Thomas P. Nikolopoulos and Henryk Skarżyńśki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cochlear Implants International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cochlear Implants International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cochlear Implants International.

Countries where authors publish in Cochlear Implants International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cochlear Implants International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cochlear Implants International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cochlear Implants International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025