Robert M. Pike
Impact in
- Chemical Health and Safety top 2%
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Escherichia coli research studies
Papers in
-
- Australian History and Society 7
- Canadian Identity and History 5
-
- Protein purification and stability 4
- Co-authors
- Joseph E. Stiglitz (1 shared paper)S. Edward Sulkin (8 shared papers)Dwayne Winseck (7 shared papers)David M. Cameron (1 shared paper)Vikas Kuriachan (1 shared paper)John L. Sapp (1 shared paper)Ratika Parkash (1 shared paper)William G. Stevenson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Canadian Journal of Sociology (9 papers)The Journal of Immunology (5 papers)Infection and Immunity (4 papers)Experimental Biology and Medicine (3 papers)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNorway
In The Last Decade
Robert M. Pike
61 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Chemical Health and Safety 37
- Endocrinology 85
- Small Animals 78
- Development 39
- Parasitology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Pike. The network helps show where Robert M. Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 339 | |
| 2 | 1979 | 145 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 4 | 1967 | 108 | |
| 5 | 1951 | 105 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 102 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 55 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 54 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1951 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 35 | |
| 12 | 1964 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1971 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1963 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1958 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 11 |
About Robert M. Pike
Robert M. Pike is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Endocrinology and Parasitology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (7 papers), Leptospirosis research and findings (6 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (5 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (5 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (5 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Protein purification and stability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (37 citations), Endocrinology (85 citations), Small Animals (78 citations), Development (39 citations) and Parasitology (64 citations). Robert M. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joseph E. Stiglitz, S. Edward Sulkin, Dwayne Winseck, David M. Cameron, Vikas Kuriachan, John L. Sapp, Ratika Parkash, William G. Stevenson, Katja Zeppenfeld and Christopher Beeckler. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Sociology, The Journal of Immunology, Infection and Immunity, Experimental Biology and Medicine and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.