Charles E. Stevens

3.6k citations
65 papers · 2.8k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Charles E. Stevens

60 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Charles E. Stevens
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Strategy and Management 908
  • Accounting 606
  • Animal Science and Zoology 451
  • Equine 65
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 366
Replace G. E. Mitchell with:
G. E. Mitchell United States
Michael Peters Colombia
James J. Kennelly United States
Mara Miele United Kingdom
M. F. Smith United States
B.B. Bock Netherlands
Ted C. Schroeder United States
Dale Miller Australia
Martin Clarke United Kingdom
Julie A. Caswell United States
Charles E. Stevens relative to G. E. Mitchell United States G. E. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.9×
G. E. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Stevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Stevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Stevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Stevens. The network helps show where Charles E. Stevens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Stevens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Stevens Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Stevens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998476
2 1975268
3 2014230
4 2015211
5 2018130
6 1975112
7 201784
8 202072
9 201970
10 196661
11 201660
12 198058
13 202254
14 196052
15 198151
16 198051
17 196450
18 197842
19 202040
20 197838

About Charles E. Stevens

Charles E. Stevens is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (18 papers), International Business and FDI (17 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (4 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (908 citations), Accounting (606 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (451 citations), Equine (65 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (366 citations). Charles E. Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Ian D. Hume, E. T. Clemens, En Xie, Mike W. Peng, Mary Southworth, Erin E. Makarius, Aloysius Newenham‐Kahindi, Debmalya Mukherjee, A. F. Sellers and С. А. Лебедев. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Nutrition, Journal of International Business Studies and Journal of World Business.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact