Robert L. Snipes

30 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Robert L. Snipes
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • General Dentistry 30
  • Equine 21
  • Animal Science and Zoology 123
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Urology 49
Replace K.C. Richardson with:
K.C. Richardson Australia
Sanet H. Kotzé South Africa
Carol S. Williams United States
S. Arrighi Italy
Kazuyuki Ono Japan
Marta Romano Mexico
N Kitamura Japan
V. Pedini Italy
Minna Kujala Finland
J. F. Munnell United States
Robert L. Snipes relative to K.C. Richardson Australia K.C. Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
K.C. Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Snipes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Snipes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Snipes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Snipes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Snipes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Snipes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Snipes. The network helps show where Robert L. Snipes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert L. Snipes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert L. Snipes Line = papers co-authored together Robert L. Snipes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008273
2 1969133
3 198272
4 197958
5 198145
6 200845
7 200341
8 196836
9 197231
10 199129
11 199725
12 198825
13 197920
14 196718
15 199118
16 198218
17 198417
18 197917
19 199716
20 199414

About Robert L. Snipes

Robert L. Snipes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Urology, Ecology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (6 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (30 citations), Equine (21 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (123 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations) and Urology (49 citations). Robert L. Snipes has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J. P. Tranzer, H. Thoenen, Horst‐Werner Korf, Eveline Baumgart‐Vogt, Jean‐Pierre Timmermans, Friedrich Paulsen, Gabriele M. Rune, Helmut Wicht, John Richards and Göran Björnhag. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in anatomy, embryology and cell biology, Cell and Tissue Research, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Zoomorphology and Zoosystematics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact