Robert E. Kemm

792 citations
22 papers · 668 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Kemm

20 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Robert E. Kemm
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Sensory Systems 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 221
  • Education 267
  • Media Technology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
Replace Robert L. Dunbar with:
Robert L. Dunbar United States
Edwin R. Griff United States
Carolyn Szostak Canada
Julio J. Ramirez United States
Chia-Jung Chang Taiwan
Kacy Redd United States
Ignacio Morón Spain
Kirsten A. Porter‐Stransky United States
Ian M. Devonshire United Kingdom
Robert E. Kemm relative to Robert L. Dunbar United States Robert L. Dunbar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Robert L. Dunbar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Kemm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Kemm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Kemm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Kemm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Kemm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Kemm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Kemm. The network helps show where Robert E. Kemm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Kemm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Kemm Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Kemm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009207
2
The Basal ganglia : structure and function
1984152
3 200894
4 199136
5 199628
6 199627
7 197826
8 198426
9 199224
10 199420
11 20076
12 19845
13 20024
14 20003
15 20013
16
Learning of Key Scientific Concepts in a Web-Based On-Campus Collaborative Learning Environment.
20012
17 20072
18
Designing for change in laboratory teaching: Pharmacology and physiology
19941
19 20031
20 20031

About Robert E. Kemm

Robert E. Kemm is a scholar working on Education, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Media Technology and Neurology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (89 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (221 citations), Education (267 citations), Media Technology (74 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations). Robert E. Kemm has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John S. McKenzie, David A. Williams, J.S. McKenzie, Anthony D. Shafton, Wolfgang Kunze, D. R. Westbury, Dominic Wall, Xueyong Wang, John Zalcberg and Debbi Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Neuroscience, Brain Research, The FASEB Journal and Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact