Robert E. Kemm

792 citations
20 papers · 601 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Kemm

18 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers

Robert E. Kemm
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Sensory Systems 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 190
  • Education 250
  • Media Technology 71
  • Computer Science Applications 31
Replace RJ Sutherland with:
RJ Sutherland India
Robert L. Dunbar United States
Edwin R. Griff United States
Carolyn Szostak Canada
Chia-Jung Chang Taiwan
Anna Shin South Korea
Ignacio Morón Spain
Julio J. Ramirez United States
Kirsten A. Porter‐Stransky United States
Robert E. Kemm relative to RJ Sutherland India RJ Sutherland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
RJ Sutherland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Kemm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Kemm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Kemm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Kemm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Kemm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Kemm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Kemm. The network helps show where Robert E. Kemm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Kemm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Kemm Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Kemm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2009192
2
The Basal ganglia : structure and function
1984121
3 200891
4 199134
5 199626
6 199626
7 198425
8 197823
9 199222
10 199420
11 20076
12 20023
13 20003
14 20013
15
Learning of Key Scientific Concepts in a Web-Based On-Campus Collaborative Learning Environment.
20012
16 20072
17 20031
18 20031
19
Critical Thinking In Physiology: A REASON!-Able Approach
19990
20
Developing a Collaborative Learning Environment in Physiology – Using an Online Architecture to Link Faculty and Institution Needs
20010

About Robert E. Kemm

Robert E. Kemm is a scholar working on Education, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Media Technology, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 20 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (82 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (190 citations), Education (250 citations), Media Technology (71 citations) and Computer Science Applications (31 citations). Robert E. Kemm has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John S. McKenzie, David A. Williams, J.S. McKenzie, Wolfgang Kunze, Anthony D. Shafton, D. R. Westbury, John Zalcberg, Dominic Wall, Xueyong Wang and Debbi Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Neuroscience, The FASEB Journal, Brain Research and Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact