Robert E. Hughes

4.3k citations
63 papers · 3.0k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Hughes

62 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Robert E. Hughes
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Aging 225
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 655
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Polymers and Plastics 240
  • Cell Biology 267
Replace Xiaoyun Chen with:
Xiaoyun Chen United States
Donna Palmer United States
Francesco A. Aprile United Kingdom
Kyle R. Gee United States
Markus Müller Germany
Taro Tachibana Japan
David R. Trentham United Kingdom
A. Elliott United Kingdom
Devrim Acehan United States
Duilio Cascio United States
Robert E. Hughes relative to Xiaoyun Chen United States Xiaoyun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Xiaoyun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Hughes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Hughes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Hughes. The network helps show where Robert E. Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Hughes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Hughes Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Hughes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005384
2 2012172
3 2011136
4 2010136
5 1959128
6 2008122
7 1997118
8 1958114
9 1956100
10 197998
11 200197
12 200994
13 201475
14 201369
15 199069
16 201062
17 200158
18 197157
19 198657
20 201449

About Robert E. Hughes

Robert E. Hughes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 63 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (12 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (11 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (5 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (225 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (655 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Polymers and Plastics (240 citations) and Cell Biology (267 citations). Robert E. Hughes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. B. Kinsinger, Russell Bell, Stanley Fields, W. C. Forsman, Sudhir Sahasrabudhe, James B. Hurley, Rakesh Chettier, James M. Olson, Melissa R. Sarantos and M. E. Leonowicz. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Aging Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact