Robert Douglas
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
-
- Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Papers in
-
- Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing 1
- Co-authors
- David Hansman (1 shared paper)Lorraine Devitt (1 shared paper)Ioan Fazey (1 shared paper)David B. Lindenmayer (1 shared paper)J.D. Salisbury (1 shared paper)John H. Maindonald (1 shared paper)Julie L. Boerner (1 shared paper)Sarah J. Parsons (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Environmental Conservation (1 paper)Epidemiology (1 paper)British journal of surgery (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Douglas
9 papers receiving 390 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 16
- Epidemiology 124
- Clinical Biochemistry 12
- Molecular Medicine 15
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 18
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Douglas
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Douglas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Douglas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Douglas. The network helps show where Robert Douglas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Robert Douglas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 150 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 148 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 79 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 1 |
About Robert Douglas
Robert Douglas is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Toxicology, Molecular Medicine, Parasitology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (1 paper), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (1 paper), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations), Epidemiology (124 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (12 citations), Molecular Medicine (15 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (18 citations). Robert Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Hansman, Lorraine Devitt, Ioan Fazey, David B. Lindenmayer, J.D. Salisbury, John H. Maindonald, Julie L. Boerner, Sarah J. Parsons, Icksoo Lee and Maik Hüttemann. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Conservation, Epidemiology, British journal of surgery, New England Journal of Medicine and British Journal of Anaesthesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.