Environmental Conservation

2.6k papers and 76.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Environmental Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 76.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Conservation usually cover Global and Planetary Change (884 papers), Ecology (815 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (444 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (479 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (300 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Conservation are Alan H. Fielding, John F. Bell, Angela Cropper, Daniel M. Alongi, Philip M. Fearnside, Carlos M. Duarte, Michael J. Kennish, Klement Tockner, Jack A. Stanford and Edward B. Barbier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026