J.D. Salisbury

630 citations
5 papers · 506 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

J.D. Salisbury

5 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

J.D. Salisbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 98
  • Global and Planetary Change 125
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 53
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 34
  • Ecological Modeling 7
Replace Ko Konno with:
Ko Konno United Kingdom
Chris Filardi United States
Samantha H. Cheng United States
Thomas Pienkowski United Kingdom
Eleanor R. Tew United Kingdom
Eliot B. Levine United States
Emiel de Lange United Kingdom
Maarten Van Opstal Belgium
Rosalind Aveling United Kingdom
Emily Woodhouse United Kingdom
J.D. Salisbury relative to Ko Konno United Kingdom Ko Konno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Ko Konno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.D. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.D. Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.D. Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.D. Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.D. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.D. Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.D. Salisbury. The network helps show where J.D. Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside J.D. Salisbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.D. Salisbury Line = papers co-authored together J.D. Salisbury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2006277
2 2011123
3 200479
4
Evidence-based medicine workbook: Finding and applying the best research evidence to improve patient care
200316
5
Evidence-based practice workbook : bridging the gap between health care research and practice
200711

About J.D. Salisbury

J.D. Salisbury is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (98 citations), Global and Planetary Change (125 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (53 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (34 citations) and Ecological Modeling (7 citations). J.D. Salisbury has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David B. Lindenmayer, Ioan Fazey, John A. Fazey, Stephen R. Dovers, Rebecca L. Tooher, Susan Hillier, Philippa Middleton, Adèle R. Weston, Tracy Merlin and Karen Anne Grimmer. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Conservation, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact