British Journal of Anaesthesia

16.0k papers and 481.1k indexed citations

About

The 16.0k papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 481.1k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia usually cover Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (5.8k papers), Surgery (5.8k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.6k papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4.1k papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2.9k papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Anaesthesia are Henrik Kehlet, JOHN W. DUNDEE, Tim Cook, J.P. DESBOROUGH, W.A. Macrae, C. PRYS‐ROBERTS, Paul S. Myles, W.W. MAPLESON, Helen F. Galley and J.F. Nunn.

In The Last Decade

British Journal of Anaesthesia

14.2k papers receiving 442.2k citations

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Anaesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Anaesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Anaesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026