Robert A. Gabel

25 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Robert A. Gabel
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Media Technology 60
  • Signal Processing 38
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
  • Physiology 83
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 66
Replace E. S. Gelsema with:
E. S. Gelsema Netherlands
J. M. R. Cardoso Portugal
Akira Amano Japan
Qin Wan China
John Wexler United States
Hanyu Li China
Dimitrios Charalampidis United States
Carlos Correia Portugal
Peter Santago United States
Pablo G. Tahoces Spain
Robert A. Gabel relative to E. S. Gelsema Netherlands E. S. Gelsema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
E. S. Gelsema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Gabel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Gabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Gabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Gabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Gabel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Gabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Gabel. The network helps show where Robert A. Gabel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Gabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. Gabel Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. Gabel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Signals and linear systems
1973131
2 197051
3 199446
4 199531
5 199624
6 200419
7 199118
8 197516
9 198414
10 199912
11 198612
12 198411
13 199510
14 19904
15 19953
16 19903
17 20023
18 19843
19 19822
20 19852

About Robert A. Gabel

Robert A. Gabel is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (5 papers), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (3 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (3 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (60 citations), Signal Processing (38 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations), Physiology (83 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (66 citations). Robert A. Gabel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Roberts, Salah D. Kivlighn, Peter K. S. Siegl, Peter Cervoni, David L. Crandall, Gloria J. Zingaro, N. C. Trippodo, Magdi M. Asaad, W. Lynn Rogers and D.J. Rabideau. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology and Electronics & Communications Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact