E. S. Gelsema

67 papers receiving 839 citations

Peers

E. S. Gelsema
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 214
  • Structural Biology 14
  • Biophysics 55
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 64
  • Artificial Intelligence 196
Replace Jeremiah Zhe Liu with:
Jeremiah Zhe Liu United States
Ranjan Maitra United States
Enhao Gong United States
Jacob Hinkle United States
Yonggang Lu China
Inga Strümke Norway
Júnior Barrera Brazil
Amit Chakraborty India
Victor M. Panaretos Switzerland
Gregery T. Buzzard United States
E. S. Gelsema relative to Jeremiah Zhe Liu United States Jeremiah Zhe Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jeremiah Zhe Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. S. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. S. Gelsema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. S. Gelsema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. S. Gelsema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. S. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. S. Gelsema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. S. Gelsema. The network helps show where E. S. Gelsema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. S. Gelsema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. S. Gelsema Line = papers co-authored together E. S. Gelsema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198887
2 199979
3 199664
4 199761
5 199757
6 197437
7 199833
8 200329
9 199828
10 198326
11 196424
12 199224
13 199524
14 198019
15 197818
16 196418
17 199515
18 200014
19 199414
20 195814

About E. S. Gelsema

E. S. Gelsema is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biophysics and Radiation, having authored 71 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (14 papers), AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (10 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (8 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (214 citations), Structural Biology (14 citations), Biophysics (55 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (64 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (196 citations). E. S. Gelsema has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jifke F. Veenland, Kourosh Kiani, Chris J. Snijders, Laveen N. Kanal, Daniel Q. Naiman, Arnaud Beckers, J. L. Grashuis, W.C. de Bruijn, Guinevere F. Eden and M. R. Halie. Their work appears in journals such as Methods of Information in Medicine, Journal of Microscopy, Pattern Recognition, Pattern Recognition Letters and Cytometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact