E. S. Gelsema

68 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

E. S. Gelsema
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Biophysics 75
  • Structural Biology 17
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 251
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 64
  • Artificial Intelligence 240
Replace Murray Eden with:
Murray Eden United States
Suyash P. Awate India
Zachary T. Harmany United States
Jeremiah Zhe Liu United States
Victor M. Panaretos Switzerland
Yonggang Lu China
Enhao Gong United States
Saurav Basu United States
Leszek Wojnar Poland
Ranjan S. Maitra United States
E. S. Gelsema relative to Murray Eden United States Murray Eden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.3×
Murray Eden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. S. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. S. Gelsema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. S. Gelsema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. S. Gelsema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. S. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. S. Gelsema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. S. Gelsema. The network helps show where E. S. Gelsema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. S. Gelsema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. S. Gelsema Line = papers co-authored together E. S. Gelsema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999105
2 1988101
3 199666
4 199763
5 199761
6 197445
7 199835
8 200331
9 199830
10 199530
11 198329
12 197828
13 199226
14 196424
15 198021
16 196420
17 200015
18 199415
19 195814
20 199613

About E. S. Gelsema

E. S. Gelsema is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Radiation, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (16 papers), AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (8 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (75 citations), Structural Biology (17 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (251 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (64 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (240 citations). E. S. Gelsema has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jifke F. Veenland, Laveen N. Kanal, Daniel Q. Naiman, Kourosh Kiani, Chris J. Snijders, Arnaud Beckers, Jan L. Grashuis, Wim C. de Bruijn, Guinevere F. Eden and M. R. Halie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Microscopy, Pattern Recognition, Methods of Information in Medicine, Cytometry and Pattern Recognition Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact