RL Parsons

457 citations
19 papers · 349 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

RL Parsons

19 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

RL Parsons
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 145
  • Pharmacology 28
  • Pharmacology 42
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52
  • Analytical Chemistry 23
Replace Long Jp with:
Long Jp United States
Marjorie E. Perkins United States
J D Harry United Kingdom
L. B. Cobbin Australia
A Hedges United Kingdom
Guy Leach United Kingdom
Zemin Xu China
C.J. Oddie Australia
F. N. Fastier New Zealand
Jeremy H. Thompson United States
RL Parsons relative to Long Jp United States Long Jp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Long Jp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by RL Parsons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RL Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RL Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RL Parsons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RL Parsons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RL Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RL Parsons. The network helps show where RL Parsons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside RL Parsons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with RL Parsons Line = papers co-authored together RL Parsons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 197592
2 198739
3 196638
4 198627
5 196919
6 196916
7 196616
8 197415
9 196913
10 197711
11 197211
12 19789
13 19839
14 19719
15 19777
16
Development of commercially viable enantioselective processes for HIV-1 NNRTIs.
20007
17 20146
18 20164
19 20211

About RL Parsons

RL Parsons is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology and Small Animals, having authored 19 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (145 citations), Pharmacology (28 citations), Pharmacology (42 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (23 citations). RL Parsons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C M Kaye, CM Castleden, W. W. Hofmann, Suzanne T. Millman, J.R. Trounce, M. Laurence and Jared A. Danielson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Animal Welfare, Journal of Neuroscience and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact