Rita Smith

24 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Rita Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Health Professions 285
  • Leadership and Management 20
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 23
  • Research and Theory 36
  • Health Information Management 50
Replace Edith Roth Gjevjon with:
Edith Roth Gjevjon Norway
Diane R. Lancaster United States
Diana Jefferies Australia
Grainne Lowe Australia
Darrell R. Spurlock United States
Tanya Heyns South Africa
Mike Walsh United Kingdom
Irmajean Bajnok Canada
Ana Vanessa Antunes Portugal
Kerstin Nilsson Kajermo Sweden
Rita Smith relative to Edith Roth Gjevjon Norway Edith Roth Gjevjon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Edith Roth Gjevjon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Smith. The network helps show where Rita Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita Smith Line = papers co-authored together Rita Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005128
2 197360
3 201745
4 201844
5 201140
6 201337
7 201836
8 201632
9 201717
10 201817
11 201716
12 201712
13 19789
14 20019
15 20219
16 20218
17
A Survey of Telephone Inquiries: Case Study and Operational Impact in an Academic Library Reference Department.
19936
18 20206
19 19935
20 20234

About Rita Smith

Rita Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 25 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (7 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Web and Library Services (3 papers), Library Science and Information (3 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (285 citations), Leadership and Management (20 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (23 citations), Research and Theory (36 citations) and Health Information Management (50 citations). Rita Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eileen Furlong, Laserina O’Connor, Martin S. McNamara, Gerard Fealy, Mary Casey, Ovide F. Pomerleau, Diarmuid Stokes, Denise O’Brien, Denise O’Leary and Mary Ellen Smith Glasgow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, College & Research Libraries and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact