Mike Walsh

785 citations
50 papers · 443 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mike Walsh

46 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Mike Walsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 202
  • Emergency Medicine 53
  • Radiation 54
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 75
Replace Joanna Hope with:
Joanna Hope United Kingdom
Kenneth Miller United States
Timothy Gray United States
Dawn Jackson United Kingdom
G. Castro Italy
Pierre Demaret Belgium
M. Große Perdekamp Germany
Daniel A. Evans United States
A. Chalupka Austria
A. Bernstein United States
Mike Walsh relative to Joanna Hope United Kingdom Joanna Hope's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Joanna Hope · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Walsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Walsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Walsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Walsh. The network helps show where Mike Walsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike Walsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike Walsh Line = papers co-authored together Mike Walsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201249
2 201241
3 200037
4
An international prospective cohort study evaluating major vascular complications among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: the VISION Pilot Study.
201126
5 201022
6 201020
7 201619
8 200918
9 201718
10 199016
11 200614
12 200013
13
Nurse practitioners : clinical skills and professional issues
199911
14 199911
15 200811
16 199410
17 200610
18 20128
19 20188
20 19898

About Mike Walsh

Mike Walsh is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (17 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (9 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (7 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers) and Health Services Management and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (202 citations), Emergency Medicine (53 citations), Radiation (54 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (75 citations). Mike Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. Scannell, Kumaran Ratnasingham, Simon Fleming, G. Vayakis, V.S. Udintsev, L. Bertalot, Yu. A. Kashchuk, M. Beurskens, R. Barnsley and A. Encheva. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Fusion, Studies In Australasian Cinema, Fusion Engineering and Design and Journal of Instrumentation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact