Richard Wright

188 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Richard Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Gastroenterology 591
  • Linguistics and Language 408
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 775
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 771
  • Speech and Hearing 194
Replace Melissa Wake with:
Melissa Wake Australia
Paul S. Davies United States
Elaine Smith United States
Neil C. Thomson United Kingdom
John C. Marshall United Kingdom
Janine E. Janosky United States
David Nunan United Kingdom
Michael Ward United States
Emma K. Larkin United States
John J. Kim United States
Richard Wright relative to Melissa Wake Australia Melissa Wake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.6×
Melissa Wake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Wright. The network helps show where Richard Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Wright Line = papers co-authored together Richard Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 200 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997229
2 1983217
3 2004201
4 2001156
5 1992147
6 1993135
7 2003131
8 1979110
9 2002106
10 1990104
11 2003104
12 200666
13 200566
14 198562
15 201360
16 201158
17 200053
18 200551
19 201251
20 197749

About Richard Wright

Richard Wright is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics and Language, Surgery and Gastroenterology, having authored 200 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (40 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (25 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (24 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (17 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (16 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (11 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (591 citations), Linguistics and Language (408 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (775 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (771 citations) and Speech and Hearing (194 citations). Richard Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Ronald C. Petersen, Pamela E. Souza, A Hurwitz, Stefan A. Frisch, Edward Flemming, Daniel McCloy, Scott Jacques, Keith Johnson, Trevor Bennett and Sam Krinsky. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Digestive Diseases and Sciences and Journal of Criminal Justice Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact