Daniel McCloy

23 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Daniel McCloy
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Linguistics and Language 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Developmental Biology 14
  • Cultural Studies 43
Replace Egidio Marsico with:
Egidio Marsico France
Rachel Smith United Kingdom
Leona Polyanskaya Spain
Julia Strand United States
Melissa A. Redford United States
Roberta Bianco United Kingdom
Carole T. Ferrand United States
Madalena Cruz‐Ferreira Singapore
Efthymia C. Kapnoula United States
Philip J. Monahan Canada
Daniel McCloy relative to Egidio Marsico France Egidio Marsico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Egidio Marsico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel McCloy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel McCloy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel McCloy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel McCloy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel McCloy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel McCloy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel McCloy. The network helps show where Daniel McCloy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel McCloy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel McCloy Line = papers co-authored together Daniel McCloy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201360
2 201251
3 201433
4 201729
5 201625
6 201621
7 202116
8 201812
9 20187
10 20147
11 20226
12 20156
13 20194
14 20243
15 20143
16 20182
17
Prosody, intelligibility and familiarity in speech perception
20132
18 20252
19 20122
20 20142

About Daniel McCloy

Daniel McCloy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics and Language and Signal Processing, having authored 23 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (4 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (49 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations), Developmental Biology (14 citations) and Cultural Studies (43 citations). Daniel McCloy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Richard Wright, Pamela E. Souza, Adrian K. C. Lee, Steven Moran, Eric B. Larson, Jason D. Yeatman, Eric D. Larson, Preethi Jyothi, Stephen R. Dager and Edmund C. Lalor. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Language, Frontiers in Neurology and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact