Richard Hoefer

88 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Richard Hoefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Public Administration 282
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 43
  • Cancer Research 156
  • Communication 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 364
Replace Anne Marie McCarthy with:
Anne Marie McCarthy United States
Pauline Leonard United Kingdom
Paul White United Kingdom
David Halle Israel
Thomas R. Cusack Germany
Marc Estève United Kingdom
Christopher Humphrey United Kingdom
Stefanie Walter Switzerland
Michelle Brown Australia
John Magenau United States
Richard Hoefer relative to Anne Marie McCarthy United States Anne Marie McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Anne Marie McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hoefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hoefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hoefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hoefer. The network helps show where Richard Hoefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Hoefer Line = papers co-authored together Richard Hoefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020229
2 200077
3 202162
4 201061
5 199061
6 202245
7 199038
8 200535
9 201734
10 197734
11 199930
12 200129
13 200326
14 201525
15 201624
16 200022
17 199622
18 199422
19 200721
20 200021

About Richard Hoefer

Richard Hoefer is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (22 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (16 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (282 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), Cancer Research (156 citations), Communication (64 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (364 citations). Richard Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amy Tang, Harry D. Bear, Mary L. Guye, Janet S. Winston, Vasilena Zheleva, David Chang, Jeffrey J. DuBois, Rick J. Jansen, Larry Watson and Beverly M. Black. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work, Administration in Social Work, Nonprofit Management and Leadership and Journal of Social Service Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact