Richard Hoefer

92 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Richard Hoefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Public Administration 316
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 43
  • General Health Professions 226
  • Communication 71
  • Cancer Research 125
Replace Pauline Leonard with:
Pauline Leonard United Kingdom
Anne Marie McCarthy United States
Paul White United Kingdom
Christopher Humphrey United Kingdom
Marc Estève United Kingdom
Stefanie Walter Switzerland
Nathan J. Kelly United States
John Magenau United States
Bing Ran United States
Rosemary Stewart United Kingdom
Richard Hoefer relative to Pauline Leonard United Kingdom Pauline Leonard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Pauline Leonard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hoefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hoefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hoefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hoefer. The network helps show where Richard Hoefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Hoefer Line = papers co-authored together Richard Hoefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020247
2 200081
3 201068
4 202165
5 199061
6 202252
7 197739
8 199038
9 200536
10 201736
11 199932
12 200130
13 201528
14 200327
15 201626
16 200023
17 199423
18 200722
19 199622
20 200021

About Richard Hoefer

Richard Hoefer is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (25 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (17 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (5 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (316 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), General Health Professions (226 citations), Communication (71 citations) and Cancer Research (125 citations). Richard Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Amy Tang, Mary L. Guye, Harry D. Bear, Janet S. Winston, Vasilena Zheleva, Beverly M. Black, David Chang, Angela M. Tang-Tan, Rick J. Jansen and Larry Watson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work, Administration in Social Work, Journal of Social Service Research and The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact