Richard Cust
Impact in
Papers in
- History 21
- Scottish History and National Identity 17
- Historical Studies of British Isles 6
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
- Historical Studies on Spain 2
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 16
- Co-authors
- Ann Hughes (3 shared papers)Thomas Cogswell (1 shared paper)Peter Lake (1 shared paper)Conrad S. R. Russell (2 shared papers)Stephen B. Roberts (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Historical Research (3 papers)Midland History (3 papers)Parliamentary History (3 papers)Journal of British Studies (2 papers)Past & Present (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Cust
26 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- History 224
- Classics 31
- Economics and Econometrics 110
- Museology 15
- Political Science and International Relations 100
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Cust
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Cust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Cust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Cust more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Cust
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Cust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Cust. The network helps show where Richard Cust may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Richard Cust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conflict in Early Stuart England: Studies in Religion and Politics 1603-1642 | 1989 | 103 |
| 2 | 1986 | 80 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 8 | The papers of Sir Richard Grosvenor, 1st bart. (1585-1645) | 1996 | 6 |
| 9 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 13 | King James VI/I and his English Parliaments | 2011 | 4 |
| 14 | The Diary of Sir Richard Hutton, 1614-1639 | 1993 | 4 |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 2 |
About Richard Cust
Richard Cust is a scholar working on History, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Museology and Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (17 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (16 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (3 papers) and Historical Studies on Spain (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (224 citations), Classics (31 citations), Economics and Econometrics (110 citations), Museology (15 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (100 citations). Richard Cust has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ann Hughes, Thomas Cogswell, Peter Lake, Conrad S. R. Russell and Stephen B. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Research, Midland History, Parliamentary History, Journal of British Studies and Past & Present.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.