Parliamentary History

660 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 660 papers published in Parliamentary History in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Parliamentary History usually cover History (356 papers), Political Science and International Relations (272 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (184 papers) specifically the topics of Scottish History and National Identity (264 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (160 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Parliamentary History are Robert Waller, Rodney Barker, Henry Horwitz, D. George Boyce, Joanna Innes, Pauline Croft, Helen Miller, David Hayton, Richard Toye and Richard W. Davis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Parliamentary History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Parliamentary History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Parliamentary History.

Countries where authors publish in Parliamentary History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Parliamentary History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Parliamentary History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parliamentary History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025