Richard C. Wolf

51 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Richard C. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 127
  • Reproductive Medicine 248
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 350
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 173
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 210
Replace Jos H.H. Thijssen with:
Jos H.H. Thijssen Netherlands
Edward L. Klaiber United States
N. D. Martensz United Kingdom
J. J. van der Werff ten Bosch Netherlands
Harold I. Siegel United States
Leighton Seal United Kingdom
James P. MacMurray United States
Lynn Ann Watson Denmark
Peter Lidbrink Sweden
David J. Vandenbergh United States
Richard C. Wolf relative to Jos H.H. Thijssen Netherlands Jos H.H. Thijssen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Jos H.H. Thijssen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Wolf. The network helps show where Richard C. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard C. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard C. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Richard C. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014330
2 1962210
3 2015107
4 198080
5 201572
6 201465
7 197748
8 197844
9 198540
10 200136
11 198134
12 201133
13 201532
14 197930
15 198529
16 199028
17 201324
18 198124
19 201622
20 198622

About Richard C. Wolf

Richard C. Wolf is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (13 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (9 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (127 citations), Reproductive Medicine (248 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (350 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (173 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (210 citations). Richard C. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Koenigs, Robert E. Bowman, Mustafa K. Başkaya, Julian C. Motzkin, Donald J. Dierschke, Carissa L. Philippi, Reinhold J. Hutz, Ryan J. Herringa, J. A. Robinson and Maia S. Pujara. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Endocrinology, American Journal of Primatology, Steroids and Clinical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact