Richard Ames

68 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Richard Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Chemical Health and Safety 18
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 362
  • Plant Science 478
  • Cancer Research 175
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 59
Replace Michael R. Flynn with:
Michael R. Flynn United States
Julia S. Kimbell United States
Edward B. Barr United States
Christian Schweizer United States
Laurel Kincl United States
Magne Bråtveit Norway
Maria Luisa Scapellato Italy
James H. Saunders United States
Lorraine M. Conroy United States
Gavin P. Horn United States
Richard Ames relative to Michael R. Flynn United States Michael R. Flynn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Michael R. Flynn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Ames. The network helps show where Richard Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Ames Line = papers co-authored together Richard Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994236
2 2005148
3 200587
4 199578
5 200175
6 199474
7 198541
8 198939
9 198937
10 199336
11 198334
12 198333
13 198232
14 198425
15 199123
16 195122
17 201022
18 198921
19 198420
20 198318

About Richard Ames

Richard Ames is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Aerospace Engineering and Cancer Research, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (12 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (10 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (8 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (5 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (4 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (18 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (362 citations), Plant Science (478 citations), Cancer Research (175 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (59 citations). Richard Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kyle Steenland, B S Jenkins, John Russo, David Chrislip, Michael O’Malley, Fred H. Sklar, Richard J. Jackson, Wen‐Zong Whong, Narayanan Komerath and Robert B. Reger. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Occupational Medicine, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, American Journal of Public Health and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact