David Rempel

196 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Peers

David Rempel
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 743
  • Pharmacology 2.1k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 862
  • Social Psychology 2.0k
  • Occupational Therapy 278
Replace Jaap H. van Dieën with:
Jaap H. van Dieën Netherlands
Pascal Madeleine Denmark
Thomas J. Armstrong United States
Lars L. Andersen Denmark
Chris J. Snijders Netherlands
Svend Erik Mathiassen Sweden
Roland Kadefors Sweden
Karen Søgaard Denmark
Barbara Silverstein United States
Jack T. Dennerlein United States
David Rempel relative to Jaap H. van Dieën Netherlands Jaap H. van Dieën's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jaap H. van Dieën · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Rempel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Rempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rempel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Rempel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rempel. The network helps show where David Rempel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Rempel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Rempel Line = papers co-authored together David Rempel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 204 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998448
2 1996392
3 1992277
4 2015256
5 2013246
6 1994233
7 2006172
8
Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among computer users.
1999158
9 1995150
10 2019145
11 1999142
12 2014134
13 1997133
14 2003132
15 2002104
16 200599
17 199896
18 199793
19 200691
20 200788

About David Rempel

David Rempel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Pharmacology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 204 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (62 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (59 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (28 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (24 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (24 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (22 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (19 papers) and Effects of Vibration on Health (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (743 citations), Pharmacology (2.1k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (862 citations), Social Psychology (2.0k citations) and Occupational Therapy (278 citations). David Rempel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Keir, Joel M. Bach, Julia Faucett, Edward Diao, Alan Barr, Carisa Harris‐Adamson, Andrew J. Wyrobek, Bradley Evanoff, Jack T. Dennerlein and Stephen Burastero. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, American Journal of Industrial Medicine and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact