Reginald Byron

15 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Reginald Byron
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Music 92
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Demography 104
  • Anthropology 77
  • Gender Studies 67
Replace Mark C. Carnes with:
Mark C. Carnes United States
William M. Wentworth United States
David R. Unruh United States
Vered Vinitzky‐Seroussi Israel
James Olney
Donald Brenneis United States
John Czaplicka
Simon Ottenberg United States
Lee Haring United States
Stephen A. Tyler United States
Reginald Byron relative to Mark C. Carnes United States Mark C. Carnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Mark C. Carnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reginald Byron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reginald Byron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reginald Byron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reginald Byron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reginald Byron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reginald Byron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reginald Byron. The network helps show where Reginald Byron may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Reginald Byron, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reginald Byron Line = papers co-authored together Reginald Byron links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2007154
2 1998149
3 199593
4 199744
5 198037
6 199332
7 199630
8 199821
9 199915
10 198011
11
Negotiating Culture: Moving, Mixing and Memory in Contemporary Europe
20065
12 19945
13 19983
14 19931
15 19831
16 19920

About Reginald Byron

Reginald Byron is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, General Health Professions, Music and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 16 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Natural Resources and Economic Development (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (1 paper), Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (92 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Demography (104 citations), Anthropology (77 citations) and Gender Studies (67 citations). Reginald Byron has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Stewart, John Blacking, Griff Tester, Vincent J. Roscigno, Shau Ming Mong, Jonathan P. J. Stock, Marianne Gullestad, Robin Fox, P. H. Gulliver and James Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Social Forces, Western Folklore and International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact