Ray Pike
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Memory Processes and Influences
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development
Papers in
-
- Memory Processes and Influences 8
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 5
- Co-authors
- John Bain (6 shared papers)Michael S. Humphreys (6 shared papers)Gerald Tehan (2 shared papers)Len Dalgleish (5 shared papers)Ken McFarland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychological Review (5 papers)Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (3 papers)Memory & Cognition (1 paper)Acta Psychologica (1 paper)Journal of Mathematical Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Ray Pike
14 papers receiving 826 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 692
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 268
- General Decision Sciences 35
- Social Psychology 229
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Ray Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Ray Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ray Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray Pike. The network helps show where Ray Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ray Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 437 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 124 | |
| 3 | 1973 | 120 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 103 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 0 |
About Ray Pike
Ray Pike is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 16 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers) and Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (692 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (268 citations), General Decision Sciences (35 citations), Social Psychology (229 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (128 citations). Ray Pike has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Bain, Michael S. Humphreys, Gerald Tehan, Len Dalgleish and Ken McFarland. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Memory & Cognition, Acta Psychologica and Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.