Raphaël Millière
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Sensory Systems top 10%
Papers in
-
- Embodied and Extended Cognition 2
- Cognitive Science and Education Research 1
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Leor Roseman (2 shared papers)Robin Carhart‐Harris (2 shared papers)Fynn‐Mathis Trautwein (1 shared paper)Aviva Berkovich‐Ohana (1 shared paper)David Nutt (1 shared paper)Camilla Day (1 shared paper)Michael Schartner (1 shared paper)David Erritzøe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Raphaël Millière
9 papers receiving 577 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Clinical Psychology 432
- Sensory Systems 43
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 161
- Cognitive Neuroscience 168
- Biological Psychiatry 18
Countries citing papers authored by Raphaël Millière
This map shows the geographic impact of Raphaël Millière's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raphaël Millière with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raphaël Millière more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raphaël Millière
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raphaël Millière. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raphaël Millière. The network helps show where Raphaël Millière may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Raphaël Millière, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 230 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 180 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About Raphaël Millière
Raphaël Millière is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper) and Cognitive Science and Education Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (432 citations), Sensory Systems (43 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (161 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (168 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (18 citations). Raphaël Millière has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Leor Roseman, Robin Carhart‐Harris, Fynn‐Mathis Trautwein, Aviva Berkovich‐Ohana, David Nutt, Camilla Day, Michael Schartner, David Erritzøe, Christopher Timmermann and Robert Leech. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Synthese, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.