David Luke

27 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

David Luke
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Development 25
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19
  • Public Administration 13
  • Political Science and International Relations 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
Replace H. Kwasi Prempeh with:
H. Kwasi Prempeh United States
Rainer Tetzlaff Germany
Julián F. Bertranou Argentina
Mamoudou Gazibo Canada
Stephen Hoadley New Zealand
J. Peter Pham United States
A. Carl LeVan United States
Jonathan N. C. Hill United Kingdom
Bahgat Korany Canada
Tariq Dana Qatar
David Luke relative to H. Kwasi Prempeh United States H. Kwasi Prempeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
H. Kwasi Prempeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Luke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Luke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Luke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Luke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Luke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Luke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Luke. The network helps show where David Luke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Luke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Luke Line = papers co-authored together David Luke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198822
2 198612
3
Women and development in Africa: comparative perspectives.
198912
4 199612
5 19899
6 19868
7 20238
8 19866
9 19866
10 19906
11 19906
12 20196
13 19855
14 20235
15 19844
16 19854
17
Electoral Politics in Sierra Leone: An Appraisal of the 1982 Elections
19854
18 19843
19 19873
20 20233

About David Luke

David Luke is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Development, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (10 papers), World Trade Organization Law (9 papers), International Development and Aid (8 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (8 papers), African history and culture studies (6 papers), Global Political and Social Dynamics (4 papers), Public Administration in Developing Nations (3 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (25 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (19 citations), Public Administration (13 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (61 citations). David Luke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Fred Manwarren Hayward, Jane L. Parpart, Julie Flint, E. Frances White, Kim Forss, Timothy M. Shaw and Jennifer Seymour Whitaker. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines, Journal of World Trade, Public Administration and Development and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact