Radhika Devraj

852 citations
37 papers · 608 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Radhika Devraj

33 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Radhika Devraj
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Family Practice 19
  • General Health Professions 243
  • Transplantation 24
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Nephrology 31
Replace Deborah H. Boehm with:
Deborah H. Boehm United States
Vincent Dumez Canada
Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad Norway
Evridiki Kaba Greece
Jessica Gacki‐Smith United States
Margrid Beuter Brazil
Philippe Karazivan Canada
Valerie Swigart United States
Heloísa de Carvalho Torres Brazil
George Sayre United States
Radhika Devraj relative to Deborah H. Boehm United States Deborah H. Boehm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Deborah H. Boehm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Radhika Devraj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Radhika Devraj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Radhika Devraj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radhika Devraj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Radhika Devraj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Radhika Devraj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Radhika Devraj. The network helps show where Radhika Devraj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Radhika Devraj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Radhika Devraj Line = papers co-authored together Radhika Devraj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200992
2 200979
3 201568
4 201058
5 201353
6 201843
7 202033
8 201931
9 201622
10 202115
11 201213
12 201813
13 201911
14 201211
15 202310
16 20169
17 20197
18 20115
19 20155
20 20225

About Radhika Devraj

Radhika Devraj is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (19 citations), General Health Professions (243 citations), Transplantation (24 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations) and Nephrology (31 citations). Radhika Devraj has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elisa J. Gordon, Gireesh V. Gupchup, Therese I. Poirier, Lakesha M. Butler, Christopher M. Herndon, B. Zane Horowitz, A. Mary Vilay, Matthew E. Borrego, Lorraine S. Wallace and Tarek Alhamad. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, American Journal of Transplantation and Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact