Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

44.6k citations
2.6k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

1.6k papers receiving 29.5k citations

Peers

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11.8k
  • Family Practice 3.3k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.9k
  • General Health Professions 7.0k
  • Emergency Medical Services 1.6k
Replace Journal of the American Pharmacists Association with:
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association United States
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy United Kingdom
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education United States
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice United Kingdom
Clinical Therapeutics United States
Family Practice United Kingdom
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy United States
BMC Family Practice United Kingdom
British Journal of General Practice United Kingdom
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics United States
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy relative to Journal of the American Pharmacists Association United States Journal of the American Pharmacists Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.

About Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

The 2.6k papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy in the last decades have received a total of 44.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (667 papers), Family Practice (219 papers), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (68 papers), Medical Terminology (4 papers) and General Health Professions (290 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (666 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (203 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (108 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (83 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (70 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (68 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (62 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy are James B. Schreiber, Timothy Frank Chen, J. Simon Bell, Rebekah Jane Moles, Enas Almanasreh, Betty A Chewning, Natasa Gisev, Parisa Aslani, Carolina Oi Lam Ung and Anandi V. Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact