R. Neeter
Impact in
- Food Science top 2%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Advanced Scientific Research Methods
- Biotechnology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Food and Agricultural Sciences 4
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 4
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis 3
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Catrienus de Jong (3 shared papers)Servaas Visser (1 shared paper)Nico M. M. Nibbering (4 shared papers)H. T. Badings (3 shared papers)Th. J. de Boer (1 shared paper)Geert Ellen (1 shared paper)Martin A. van 't Hof (1 shared paper)A.H. Weerkamp (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Food Research and Technology (2 papers)American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (1 paper)International Dairy Journal (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
R. Neeter
15 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Food Science 322
- Biotechnology 48
- Agronomy and Crop Science 45
- Spectroscopy 61
- Animal Science and Zoology 21
Countries citing papers authored by R. Neeter
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Neeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Neeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Neeter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Neeter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Neeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Neeter. The network helps show where R. Neeter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside R. Neeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 246 | |
| 2 | Recent advances in the study of aroma compounds of milk and dairy products | 1980 | 70 |
| 3 | 1981 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1976 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 3 |
About R. Neeter
R. Neeter is a scholar working on Food Science, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Biotechnology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food and Agricultural Sciences (4 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (3 papers), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper) and Chemical synthesis and pharmacological studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (322 citations), Biotechnology (48 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (45 citations), Spectroscopy (61 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (21 citations). R. Neeter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Catrienus de Jong, Servaas Visser, Nico M. M. Nibbering, H. T. Badings, Th. J. de Boer, Geert Ellen, Martin A. van 't Hof, A.H. Weerkamp, H. Maarse and H. O. Huisman. Their work appears in journals such as European Food Research and Technology, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, International Dairy Journal, Tetrahedron Letters and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.