Ping‐Chia Li

410 citations
17 papers · 324 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Papers in

Ping‐Chia Li

17 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Ping‐Chia Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Rehabilitation 68
  • Neurology 38
  • Health 36
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 24
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 33
Replace Xiaohong Liu with:
Xiaohong Liu China
Chansol Hurr South Korea
Dereck Salisbury United States
Tim Church United States
Chloe Rezola‐Pardo Spain
Nevin Atalay Güzel Türkiye
Sławomir Kujawski Poland
Ryan J. Dougherty United States
Ping‐Chia Li relative to Xiaohong Liu China Xiaohong Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Xiaohong Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Chia Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Chia Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Chia Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Chia Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Chia Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Chia Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Chia Li. The network helps show where Ping‐Chia Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Chia Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Chia Li Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Chia Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201656
2 202152
3 202249
4 201540
5 201134
6 200819
7 201513
8 201912
9 201211
10 20029
11 20099
12 20018
13 20124
14 20234
15 20222
16 20211
17 20161

About Ping‐Chia Li

Ping‐Chia Li is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (68 citations), Neurology (38 citations), Health (36 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (24 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (33 citations). Ping‐Chia Li has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Shih-Chen Fan, Hsin-Min Lee, Lifen Liu, Hao‐Kuang Wang, Ming‐Jia Jou, Li-Ching Chang, Ho‐Chang Kuo, Chien‐Yu Huang, Wen‐Chung Chen and Wen‐Ho Chuo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Neuroscience, Sensors, Autonomic Neuroscience and BMC Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact