Ping Zhu

1k citations
52 papers · 814 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Zhu

48 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Ping Zhu
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Genetics 188
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 118
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 44
  • Physiology 12
  • Cell Biology 41
Replace Natalie Burkard with:
Natalie Burkard Germany
Hanne Birte Mikkelsen Denmark
Jinjiang Pang United States
Masaki Igarashi Japan
Maoqing Ye China
Jianting Shi China
Jiean Huang China
Ruteja A. Barve United States
Manling Zhang China
Ping Zhu relative to Natalie Burkard Germany Natalie Burkard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Natalie Burkard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Zhu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Zhu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Zhu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Zhu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Zhu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Zhu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Zhu. The network helps show where Ping Zhu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Zhu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Zhu Line = papers co-authored together Ping Zhu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201688
2 202176
3 202058
4 202057
5 202043
6 202132
7 201631
8 201930
9 201629
10 200928
11 202028
12 199726
13 201925
14 201423
15 201823
16 201819
17 201217
18 201915
19 201915
20 201914

About Ping Zhu

Ping Zhu is a scholar working on Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 52 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory Bowel Disease (11 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (2 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (2 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (188 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (118 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (44 citations), Physiology (12 citations) and Cell Biology (41 citations). Ping Zhu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Xueying Lin, Bolin Yang, Peter C. Harris, Cynthia J. Sieben, Hongjin Chen, Xiao Ma, Krešimir Krnjević, Yugen Chen, Ping Liu and Huiru Bai. Their work appears in journals such as JCI Insight, World Journal of Gastroenterology, Medicine, Nephron Clinical Practice and Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact