Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine

23.5k citations
2.1k papers · · active since 2003

Impact in

    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
    • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
    • Medical Research and Treatments
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis

Papers in

    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies 483
    • Medical Research and Treatments 309
    • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 213
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 179
    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 126

Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine

2k papers receiving 22.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 7.7k
  • Drug Discovery 67
  • Pharmacology 951
  • Pharmacology 1.3k
  • Plant Science 2.8k
Replace Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine with:
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine China
Integrative Cancer Therapies United States
Chinese Medicine China
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies China
Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines China
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine China
Inflammopharmacology India
African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines China
Die Pharmazie China
Journal of Natural Medicines Japan
Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine relative to Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine China Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine.

About Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine

The 2.1k papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (1.1k papers), Drug Discovery (6 papers), Pharmacology (71 papers), Pharmacology (92 papers) and Hepatology (53 papers) specifically the topics of Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (483 papers), Medical Research and Treatments (309 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (213 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (179 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (126 papers), Medicinal Plant Research (87 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (56 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine are David Moher, Changquan Ling, Kenneth F. Schulz, Rohitash Jamwal, Arthur Yin Fan, Neeraj Kumar Sethiya, Chengjian Zheng, Zhao-Xiang Bian, Anisur Rahman Khuda‐Bukhsh and Eric Wei Chiang Chan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact