Biqing Chen

23 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Biqing Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Modeling and Simulation 20
  • Cancer Research 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 41
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 32
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 18
Replace Yuhong Li with:
Yuhong Li China
Sharat Jacob Vayttaden United States
Omer Karin Israel
Hanbing Song China
Binwei Yao China
Al‐Hassan Soliman Wadan Egypt
Xinying Zhang China
Yilin Shen China
Maira Smaniotto Cucielo Brazil
Biqing Chen relative to Yuhong Li China Yuhong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Yuhong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Biqing Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Biqing Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biqing Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biqing Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Biqing Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Biqing Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Biqing Chen. The network helps show where Biqing Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Biqing Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Biqing Chen Line = papers co-authored together Biqing Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202058
2 201144
3 202028
4 201727
5 201823
6 202320
7 201914
8 202313
9 201812
10 202212
11 201812
12 202210
13 20149
14 20218
15 20186
16 20166
17 20204
18 20193
19 20243
20 20233

About Biqing Chen

Biqing Chen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cancer Research, Waste Management and Disposal, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (20 citations), Cancer Research (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (41 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (32 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (18 citations). Biqing Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Tianmin Xu, Xiaomin Yuan, Yingying Wang, Fang Fang, Yugen Chen, Haidan Wang, Minghao Liu, Tuo Chen, Qiong Wang and Ping Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Human Genetics, Scientific Reports, Annals of Hematology, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Current Cancer Drug Targets.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact