Phillip J. Wright

624 citations
22 papers · 514 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip J. Wright

22 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Phillip J. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 26
  • Organic Chemistry 237
  • Biophysics 26
  • Oncology 123
  • Inorganic Chemistry 51
Replace Meenakshi Ghosh with:
Meenakshi Ghosh India
Zhiwei Li China
Jean Bernard Tommasino France
R. A. HENDERSON United Kingdom
Silvana Sostero Italy
Justin A. Bogart United States
J. Gätjens Germany
Sarah A. Cook United States
M. Györ Hungary
Johannes Hohenberger Germany
Phillip J. Wright relative to Meenakshi Ghosh India Meenakshi Ghosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Meenakshi Ghosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip J. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip J. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip J. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip J. Wright. The network helps show where Phillip J. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip J. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Phillip J. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201752
2 201348
3 201447
4 201447
5 201833
6 201632
7 201332
8 201230
9 201328
10 201625
11 202023
12 201223
13 201322
14 201320
15 201517
16 202112
17 201711
18 19815
19 19854
20 20171

About Phillip J. Wright

Phillip J. Wright is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 22 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives (5 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (26 citations), Organic Chemistry (237 citations), Biophysics (26 citations), Oncology (123 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (51 citations). Phillip J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Massimiliano Massi, Stefano Stagni, Sara Muzzioli, Paolo Raiteri, Brian W. Skelton, Melissa V. Werrett, Doug A. Brooks, Sally E. Plush, Christie A. Bader and Debbie S. Silvester. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Inorganic Chemistry, Organometallics, Chemistry - A European Journal and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact