Robert D. Brooks

37 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Robert D. Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Oncology 146
  • Cancer Research 67
  • Immunology 80
  • Biophysics 27
Replace Shinji Takamatsu with:
Shinji Takamatsu Japan
Tina Tu-Thu Ngoc Nguyen Canada
Yu Xi China
Yoshiyuki Kioi Japan
Mohammad Akbarzadeh Germany
Viswanathan Palanisamy United States
Jinzi Zheng Canada
Yimeng Gao China
Tina S. Morris United States
Lin Liu China
Robert D. Brooks relative to Shinji Takamatsu Japan Shinji Takamatsu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Shinji Takamatsu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Brooks. The network helps show where Robert D. Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021120
2 202178
3 202058
4 201454
5 201451
6 202242
7 202331
8 202029
9 202029
10 202226
11 202217
12 202014
13 202114
14 202314
15 202311
16 202411
17 202310
18 202310
19 20219
20 20229

About Robert D. Brooks

Robert D. Brooks is a scholar working on Oncology, Cell Biology, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (8 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (6 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (5 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers) and Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Oncology (146 citations), Cancer Research (67 citations), Immunology (80 citations) and Biophysics (27 citations). Robert D. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Doug A. Brooks, John J. O’Leary, Stavros Selemidis, Ross Vlahos, Sharon A. O’Toole, Cara M. Martin, Sally E. Plush, Stella Liong, Eunice E. To and Jonathan Rodrigo Erlich. Their work appears in journals such as Cancers, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, Scientific Reports and Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact