Philippe Tessier

33 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Philippe Tessier
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Transplantation 10
  • Demography 37
  • General Health Professions 66
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace Christopher Barrick with:
Christopher Barrick United States
Desirée Burgh United States
Rashid Ahmed Canada
Ceinwen E. Cumming Canada
Zhenzhong Qian China
Jennifer Finnegan-John United Kingdom
Ruth Lo Australia
H. Steven Greer United Kingdom
Rhonda J. Moore United States
Jana Fürstová Czechia
Philippe Tessier relative to Christopher Barrick United States Christopher Barrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Christopher Barrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Tessier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Tessier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Tessier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Tessier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Tessier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Tessier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Tessier. The network helps show where Philippe Tessier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Tessier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippe Tessier Line = papers co-authored together Philippe Tessier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201170
2
Treatment of major affective disorder with fluvoxamine.
198754
3 201224
4 200523
5 201620
6 200518
7 201518
8 202017
9 201916
10 201614
11 201614
12 200514
13 20229
14 20058
15 20187
16 20217
17 20116
18 20184
19 20094
20 20194

About Philippe Tessier

Philippe Tessier is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (21 citations), Transplantation (10 citations), Demography (37 citations), General Health Professions (66 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Philippe Tessier has collaborated with scholars based in France, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Angélique Bonnaud‐Antignac, Sophie Lelorain, François‐Charles Wolff, Agnès Florin, Véronique Sebille, Claudine Attias‐Donfut, Claudine Attias-Donfut, Myriam Blanchin, Michael W. Browne and Yohann Foucher. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMC Nephrology, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The European Journal of Health Economics and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact