Philippe Bisel
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Papers in
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 9
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 8
- Co-authors
- Volker Auwärter (10 shared papers)Bjoern Moosmann (6 shared papers)Michael Andreas Müller (7 shared papers)Folker Westphal (5 shared papers)Lo′ay A. Al-Momani (1 shared paper)August Wilhelm Frahm (9 shared papers)Florian S. Franz (3 shared papers)Laura M. Huppertz (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Drug Testing and Analysis (4 papers)Tetrahedron Asymmetry (4 papers)Forensic Toxicology (3 papers)Chirality (3 papers)ChemBioChem (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
Philippe Bisel
29 papers receiving 602 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Toxicology 324
- Pharmacology 174
- Clinical Psychology 147
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 129
- Organic Chemistry 127
Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Bisel
This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Bisel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Bisel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Bisel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Bisel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Bisel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Bisel. The network helps show where Philippe Bisel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Bisel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 6 |
About Philippe Bisel
Philippe Bisel is a scholar working on Toxicology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (9 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (7 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (324 citations), Pharmacology (174 citations), Clinical Psychology (147 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (129 citations) and Organic Chemistry (127 citations). Philippe Bisel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Volker Auwärter, Bjoern Moosmann, Michael Andreas Müller, Folker Westphal, Lo′ay A. Al-Momani, August Wilhelm Frahm, Florian S. Franz, Laura M. Huppertz, Verena Angerer and Stefan Kneisel. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, Forensic Toxicology, Chirality and ChemBioChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.