Philippe Bisel
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Papers in
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 8
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 3
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 9
- Co-authors
- Volker Auwärter (10 shared papers)Bjoern Moosmann (6 shared papers)Michael Müller (7 shared papers)Folker Westphal (5 shared papers)Lo′ay A. Al-Momani (1 shared paper)August Wilhelm Frahm (10 shared papers)Florian Franz (3 shared papers)Laura M. Huppertz (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Asymmetry (4 papers)Drug Testing and Analysis (4 papers)Forensic Toxicology (3 papers)ChemBioChem (3 papers)Chirality (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
Philippe Bisel
28 papers receiving 574 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Toxicology 304
- Pharmacology 167
- Clinical Psychology 138
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
- Organic Chemistry 124
Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Bisel
This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Bisel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Bisel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Bisel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Bisel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Bisel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Bisel. The network helps show where Philippe Bisel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Bisel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 6 |
About Philippe Bisel
Philippe Bisel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (9 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (9 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (304 citations), Pharmacology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations) and Organic Chemistry (124 citations). Philippe Bisel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Volker Auwärter, Bjoern Moosmann, Michael Müller, Folker Westphal, Lo′ay A. Al-Momani, August Wilhelm Frahm, Florian Franz, Laura M. Huppertz, Verena Angerer and Sebastian Broecker. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Asymmetry, Drug Testing and Analysis, Forensic Toxicology, ChemBioChem and Chirality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.