Jan Schäper

22 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Jan Schäper
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Toxicology 148
  • Analytical Chemistry 72
  • Spectroscopy 118
  • Pharmacology 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 61
Replace Peter Ondra with:
Peter Ondra Czechia
Taís Regina Fiorentin Brazil
Giulia Stocchero Italy
Giacomo Musile Italy
Kelly Francisco da Cunha Brazil
Maria Kała Poland
C. K. Horn United States
Fiona M. Wylie United Kingdom
Anders Just Pedersen Denmark
Xianyi Zhuo China
Jan Schäper relative to Peter Ondra Czechia Peter Ondra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Peter Ondra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schäper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schäper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schäper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schäper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schäper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schäper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schäper. The network helps show where Jan Schäper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schäper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schäper Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schäper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201456
2 201941
3 201737
4 201831
5 199828
6 201125
7 201324
8 202021
9 201221
10 202214
11 201214
12 201913
13 202113
14 202312
15 202210
16 20226
17 20193
18
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of synthetic cannabinoids in smoking mixtures of the "Spice" type using LC-MS/MS
20113
19 20212
20 20032

About Jan Schäper

Jan Schäper is a scholar working on Toxicology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Biomedical Engineering and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (14 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (148 citations), Analytical Chemistry (72 citations), Spectroscopy (118 citations), Pharmacology (78 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (61 citations). Jan Schäper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas H. Bings, Markus R. Meyer, Sascha K. Manier, Volker Auwärter, Andreas Keller, Folker Westphal, Lilian H.J. Richter, Gary M. Hieftje, Jacob T. Shelley and Bernd Tieke. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Analytical Chemistry, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact